David Harvey’s post on Piketty is available here. It adds to other reviews (see for example James K. Galbraith linked here; or Julio Juato’s here), very much in the same line, suggesting that while relevant from an empirical point of view, it is flawed from a theoretical perspective.
From his conclusion:

“There is much that is valuable in Piketty’s data sets. But his explanation as to why the inequalities and oligarchic tendencies arise is seriously flawed. His proposals as to the remedies for the inequalities are naïve if not utopian. And he has certainly not produced a working model for capital of the twenty-first century. For that we still need Marx or his modern-day equivalent.”

Latest Tweets

  • URPE stands solidarity with all those marching for justice against institutionalized racism and white supremacy acr… https://t.co/fiy4N657EV
    1 month ago
  • URPE strongly endorses the @NEAEcon statement denouncing the acts of violence against Black and Brown communities.… https://t.co/ci1qn1NjpE
    1 month ago
  • URPE Steering Committee member Mona Ali on why we need a new international monetary system. https://t.co/7lCcHqYRuO
    1 month ago